Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Butterfly Caught

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. One song like this in a permanent sentence is obviously not note worthy.Voice of All^T|@|ESP 05:55, 7 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Butterfly Caught

Delete This article has inappropriate tone, is only one sentence in length, has too little info to convey any meaningfyl information, and in short is utterly worthless. Rlevse 14:17, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:26, 20 December 2005 (UTC)

• keep - I believe this refers to the song by Massive Attack, and listings for individual songs appear acceptable, (although I think some guidelines would be good). Needs wikifying MNewnham 15:53, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete - no context. One sentence does not a Wikipedia article make. B.Wind 17:18, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• DeleteA one sentence opinion about a NN song. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Obina (talk • contribs) 17:57, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to 100th Window. While it was released as a single, it appears not to have done particularly well in the charts and there is little verifiable material to add to the current one line article. Capitalistroadster 18:25, 20 December 2005 (UTC)
• ""Delete"" It is a minor song in the discograpy and the article is a poor one. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 70.30.127.141 (talk • contribs) 17:27, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete I strongly disagree that most songs should merit an individual entry in Wikipedia, and this is a good case in point. If you cannot write more than one sentence about a minor song by a minor group, then it doesn't belong here. If you could expand this article to more than one sentence, it wouldn't be an article about the song at all, but rather an article about the "modern day cynicsm of the British underworld" whatever that is? If it's not deleted, it should be redirected to an appropriate page on a larger subject. Finally, I also think this one sentence reeks of POV, but I have never listened to this song, or this group, and I don't follow the British underground (whatever that is, I suspect that many different groups could be called "the underground" in any society), so I could be mistaken. GestaltG 18:07, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete Song needs to be placed in context of genre and reasons given for why it is notable. -- (aeropagitica)  18:53, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect -- Minor individual songs don't deserve entries, but it would still help people to find the album. P.S., GestaltG, I wouldn't call Massive Attack a minor group, since they've sold several million albums and basically founded a genre. Night Gyr 20:09, 31 December 2005 (UTC)
  • PPS. This appears to be a japan-only EP

I'm relisting this to generate more discussion. --Angr (t·c) 17:52, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete very, very close to a G1 speedy. Probably is one. Free of any and all context. WhiteNight ^{T | @ | C} 21:26, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.