Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bunce

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Withdrawn by nom after article was remade into a dab page. --Fang Aili ^talk 18:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bunce

Bunce (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

WP:ISNOT a genealogical directory. There is nothing notable about this name, and most of the article content is erroneous - unsourced because unsourceable from reputable sources, presumably. This was originally PRODded but User:Bunceboy removed the tag in less than 12 hours without explanation, so to avoid a long wrangle I have brought it here instead. HeartofaDog 13:54, 30 January 2007 (UTC) Since the article is now effectively a brand-new disambig page minus all the flannel, I'll withdraw the nomination (but will be keeping a close eye on it for seep-back).HeartofaDog 18:00, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Concur on WP:ISNOT. Lacking verifiable content, especially for some questionable claims made. Arakunem 17:38, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

Keep' Retract delete comments now that the article has been cleaned up and is appropriate disambiguation. Arakunem 17:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• Note that the article used to redirect to List of hobbit families. Uncle G 18:01, 30 January 2007 (UTC)
• I've added a list of prominent people called Bunce to the article. As such, I feel it can be kept, since it makes this no different to many other "extended disambiguation" pages dealing with surnames. Grutness...wha? 01:41, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Right. I've now taken out everything that is not sourced and needs to be - which is the whole article except for your list of sportspeople plus the two other misc refs that have appeared since this nomination. This leaves it as a completely new straightforward disambig page - no problems with that (until the next visit from the very busy Crap Genealogy Fairy). HeartofaDog 14:19, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep in its current cleaned up form (name dab page). --Fang Aili ^talk 16:31, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.