Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Britainnia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. Mo0[talk] 04:36, 19 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Britainnia

Article was recently created: contrary to its content (a synonym for "America"), it's uncommon and, at most, idiosyncratic. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 22:13, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This is, at best, an idiosyncratic term used by a small minority of Canadians. At worst, only by one. Deville 21:50, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
  
• Speedy delete This article, recently created by Britainnia (arguably a monarchist?), is not at all sourced and the term (contrary to the article) is not at all "common" (with only 731 online mentions at Google). It's validity as an alternate term for America, to which various edits have made linking to the term, is challenged. E Pluribus Anthony | talk | 21:54, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as dubious. -- Krash 16:44, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nonsense. May be worth creating a redirect to Britannia in its place, as a plausible misspelling, but that's just a suggestion. Qwghlm 20:12, 15 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as misspelled, dubious, and idiosyncratic. Stifle 23:06, 15 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.