Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian cannon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 08:03, 18 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brian cannon

Tagged as speedy, but makes claims to notability. Abstain for now. brenneman^{T}{L} 02:08, 12 February 2006 (UTC)

• Delete nn-bio. --Terence Ong 02:26, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unless this nebulous claim to "critical acclaim" can be backed up with sources. I'd like to see some awards or mainstream media coverage before I would consider that a valid claim to notability. See Wikipedia:Notability (music). Savidan 02:53, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Savidan's reasons/view on it. Dustimagic *\o/* ^{(talk/contribs)} *\o/* 03:46, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. VegaDark 04:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. StarTrek 06:03, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Keep: I've expanded the article somewhat, with references. -- Dragonfiend 08:04, 12 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. Blnguyen 03:57, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
• The article has been expanded and some references added, if they can be confirmed than this should be moved to Microdot Design & Film and kept. I'll see what I can did up. - brenneman^{T}{L} 06:38, 13 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.