Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Selden
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep ~Kylu (u|t) 00:39, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Brian Selden
Non-notable collectible card game player per WP:BIO. Article does not include sources to substantiate notability outside realm of M:TG. -- Malber (talk • contribs) 18:49, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep as this is yet another in a list of at least 8 similar entries today. At the least, user should have bundled these together so the issue itself could be directly discussed to reach a consensus, and then decisions could be made upon it. Oops. Forgot to Sign. Mister.Manticore 20:11, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment right now I'm leaning delete per WP:V as this is completely unverfied. If it were sourced though, I'd be willing to extend WP:BIO sports coverage to this guy. If walking around hitting a little ball is a sport, then cards are too.--Isotope23 20:14, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
-
- Added a link to a Wizards.com page describing his championship match, still looking on the biographical details. and found that as well. Satisfactory? Mister.Manticore 22:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment, works for me.--Isotope23 19:41, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Added a link to a Wizards.com page describing his championship match, still looking on the biographical details. and found that as well. Satisfactory? Mister.Manticore 22:33, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Not as notable as Finkel or Williams, but still a world champion of the game, which equates him with Philip Vischjager and Adam Logan for notability purposes. -- Grev 23:02, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom.--Peta 23:31, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete; while I don't think this batch of MTG nominations has been in good faith, I couldn't find any solid sources about this one. Mangojuicetalk 04:23, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, MTG world champion. Kappa 06:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep passes WP:BIO WilyD 13:05, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep champions of competitions. --badlydrawnjeff talk 13:16, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, world champion in a widely played game. —ptk✰fgs 15:29, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Strong keep, possible speedy keep, per all previous keeps. Stifle (talk) 18:19, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, and hope the nominator will consider this a lesson.-- Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus | talk 00:25, 20 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.