Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brian Brolly

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep.--May the Force be with you! Shreshth91($ |-| r 3 $ |-| t |-|) 14:18, 4 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Brian Brolly

Speedied a few times, restored a few times, I'm bringing it to AfD per Wikipedia:Undeletion_policy.

Google[1] doesn't turn up much to make me think he's encyclopedic, and news has nothing[2]. Delete unless further information can be provided to demonstrate notability. brenneman^(t)(c) 14:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

• Rewrite If the article can be expanded we'll have a better idea of notability (or otherwise). Failing expansion, I'd delete. Keep the rewrite. Dlyons493 Talk 14:58, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, thanks Jcuk. Kappa 15:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Notable in history of theatre. Obina 15:35, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep I'm sure we've seen this before somewhere? Anyway, verifiable as co-founder of established major UK radio station. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] AfD? 16:16, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• DUH Rewrote the damn thing and forgot to vote! Keep (unless voting for your own rewrite counts as vanity! ;-p )Jcuk 18:10, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Modesty dictates a mere Weak Keep under these circumstances :-) Dlyons493 Talk 21:24, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Why are articles on important figures getting speedied? -- JJay 22:40, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.