Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brenda's bane

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. NSLE _(T+C+CVU) 03:16, 22 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Brenda's bane

No assertion of meeting WP:MUSIC. 24 Google hits when excluding Wikipedia mirrors. Punkmorten 00:38, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Alr 01:00, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep <remove personal attack>. The mere fact of something's existence makes it worthy of inclusion. Kurt Weber 02:18, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• No it doesn't. Delete Reyk 10:46, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• The big toe of my left foot exists but I shouldn't write an article about it. Unfortunately, little verifiable information exists about this band and there is no evidence that they meet WP:NMG. Capitalistroadster 02:53, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as part of the fight against inclusionist vandalism. The mere fact that my Internet forum exists does not make it worthy of inclusion. Ashibaka tock 03:02, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC --Jaranda ^{wat's sup} 03:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. No indication that they've even made a demo tape. — FREAK OF NUR_xTURE (TALK) 03:34, Dec. 17, 2005
• Delete per Kurt Weber being exactly 100% wrong. -- Antaeus Feldspar 04:07, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn--MONGO 04:27, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete does not seem notable. novacatz 10:13, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete if a band can't make it in the real world, they can't make it here. Wikipedia should not be used as a blog site for wannabe bands; the number of bands and groups nominated for deletion each day suggests a much stronger force must strike down on those who think they can mis-use the music policy. doktorb | words 18:10, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Sorry if I'm a "deletionist vandal" (*snort*). --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 21:40, 17 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Quote from WP:MUSIC. "This page gives some rough guidelines which we MIGHT use to decide if a musical topic is notable. Please note that the failure to meet any of these criteria does NOT mean an article must be deleted."

caps mine. Jcuk 23:33, 17 December 2005 (UTC)

• • However, I think it should be assumed that a band failing WP:MUSIC must have a pretty bloody good reason if they want to be kept, per the variety of other Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Saberwyn 22:46, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, we have established multiple precedents with the use of WP:MUSIC. there is absolutely no need to rebuild the wheel. User:Zoe|^(talk) 01:40, 18 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:MUSIC, furthermore no assertion of notability. --Stormie 02:37, 18 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.