Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bregans
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. (aeropagitica) (talk) 17:10, 30 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Bregans
Minor fictional character in Cambridge Latin Course series, not notable enough to warrant own article. A mention in the Cambridge Latin Course article seems sufficient. SchuminWeb (Talk) 04:11, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. There are too many fictional characters hanging round here already, without adding ones from Latin textbooks. Espresso Addict 04:17, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- delete per nom Joan-of-arc 04:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete I remember this guy. No way in hell he needs his own article. Opabinia regalis 04:31, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, although I have to observe that it's too bad he's not a character in a videogame, manga or SF series, 'cause then he'd be guarenteed his own WP page. Hell, the clothes he wears would get their own WP page. --Pagana 06:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is a simple reflection of the sources available in these cases. People in the world at large simply don't write about Bregans. Whereas they write reams and reams about Pokémon characters. If you think that this is unbalanced, then campaign for people in the world at large to stop writing about Pokémon characters and start writing about Latin textbook characters. Persuade the world to make more source material on the latter. Wikipedia is not the tool for fixing any perceived disproportionate skews of the corpus of human knowledge. Wikipedia reflects human knowledge. It doesn't create it. Uncle G 15:43, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. I loved the Cambridge series. He still isn't important enough to warrant his own article; he barely deserves a mention. Captainktainer * Talk 18:16, 26 August 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
