Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Breast implant controversy
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to breast implant, which all interested editors are invited to do. Sandstein 07:01, 6 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Breast implant controversy
Started as a fork of breast implant, not much edited since, has all the hallmarks of a POV fork and is less discussed than the main article so does not seem to be under active scrutiny for neutrality. Strongly sympathetic to the implant damage cause, which is not supported by the medical establishment. Paucity of sources reinforces that. Guy (Help!) 17:51, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator's comments. --Mel Etitis (Μελ Ετητης) 18:06, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete/merge - any worthwhile information in this branch can be merged with the breast implant article. There's no need to have a separate article. --Curtis Bledsoe 18:17, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete, fork of main article, no reliable sources. Terence Ong 18:18, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge Plenty of sources, but it should probably just be a subsection of the main article. --BenWhitey 18:32, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Delete/merge any verifiable worthy information into breast implant.--Dakota 19:12, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the info.--Dakota 00:23, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and merge is not an option per GFDL requirements. --- RockMFR 21:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to breast implant. --- RockMFR 21:16, 31 December 2006 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to breast implant. Quadzilla99 00:15, 1 January 2007 (UTC)
- Merge and redirect to breast implant. Try to preserve some of the well sourced information though. Davidpdx 01:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, per nominator's comments. Uioh 18:41, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.