Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brain function map

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Neuroimaging. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-08 13:46Z

[edit] Brain function map

Brain function map (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This one is a bit interesting. On one hand it does not neatly fit into one of our speedy deletion categories, but on the other hand I have concerns over how it is written, and the possiblilty for this to become a WP:OR problem. In either case I just happened along this while clearing Category:Stubs. —— Eagle101 ^{Need help?} 07:10, 3 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete or redirect There is already information on this topic located at Cognitive science, Psychology, Neuropsychology, and others that branch off of these. There are undoubtedly enough sources on the specific topic of brain mapping to create an article on it, but as of now this article serves almost no purpose. Certainly no harm removing it, or redirecting it somewhere else until someone puts the time in to make a full fledged article. Someguy1221 08:32, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Oh great, now I've been implicated. I didn't realize that {{AFDWarningNew}} was for those who personally started the AFD. Hbdragon88 09:48, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Sounds to me from the tone of the article as though the creator intends to add OR, and there's currently no real content. Jeodesic 16:29, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. unsourced, potential "original research".--Vox Rationis (Talk | contribs) 19:44, 3 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and rd to neuroimaging. Google search for 3d map as possibly SPAM, so I rewrote the article. But looking at what I wrote, none of it deserves an article over the articles I linked to. I'm no expert, but I don't see any references to this in any of my cognitive science books. Smmurphy^(Talk) 00:10, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.