Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bradyon

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Trebor 10:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bradyon

Neologism. Even the article itself admits that it's not commonly used. Ƶ§œš¹ _{[aɪm ˈfɻɛ̃ⁿdˡi]} 21:13, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, self-admitted non-notable neologism (WP:NEO). Sandstein 21:39, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep, Although recommend change to Tardyon as the article name. Term may not be in wide unanimous use but the term is refferred to in physics journals and papers so is worthy of mention --FK65 14:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep Notable, and there is no other word for this concept --WhiteDragon 12:36, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep it's definatley noteworthy enouph --CartoonDiablo 22:50, 17 October 2006 (UTC)CartoonDiablo
• Keep, of course. Urvabara 08:17, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.