Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brad monk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Jaranda wat's sup 01:39, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Brad monk
possible violation of WP:AUTO and notability guidlines - Cybergoth 18:06, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Userfy and delete. Created by subject, I'm going WP:AUTO here. --Dennisthe2 19:53, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. YechielMan 20:00, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- I would move for a keep + major NPOV cleanup, but quite coincidentally, he's a friend of a friend, so I'm recusing per WP:COI. (|-- UlTiMuS 20:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Weak keep: Although it does need a cleanup, I think this guy may be notable. I have a few relevent links- ChartAttack review, CD Baby review, he is mentioned here and another review. J Milburn 20:25, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- I checked out the last 2 links. The first one mentions that his band was runner-up at a radio station battle of the bands. The second is a review on another band's website with no author credited. The band might warrent an article, but the person? - Cybergoth 22:45, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment: Sorry, I presumed they were the same. J Milburn 23:13, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Nice research by J Milburn, but that's pretty borderline notability, and far too little to allow a vanity article like this to exist. If someone independent bothers to write an article about him, great. Mangojuicetalk 15:34, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
