Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bottle soccer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A Train ^{take the} 09:23, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bottle soccer

Wikipedia is not for things made up in school one day. Unverifiable, and of local interest only. Note: PROD tag removed by IP editor with no explanation. FreplySpang 05:07, 31 January 2007 (UTC)

• DELETE per nom. Absolutely MiracleMat 05:14, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. The T-ness (of which WP is NF) is essentially written in the article itself. DMacks 05:23, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no sources, no claim of notability, and reasons already listed. BJ^Talk 05:53, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:18, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom; a 100% literal case of WP:NFT. Krimpet 07:37, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - just prod this kind of stuff; people rarely come back to remove prods from this kind of article. Part Deux 07:46, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment From nom: "Note: PROD tag removed by IP editor with no explanation." BJ^Talk 07:50, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
    • OK, well, then what I mean to say is WP:SNOW delete. Part Deux 08:05, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. MER-C 10:42, 31 January 2007 (UTC)
• Keep It! Sounds like a FABULOUS GAME!!! It will spread even faster if people can hear about it! Thats What Wikipedia is for. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 68.194.140.24 (talk • contribs).

• Begging your pardon, but that's actually not at all what Wikipedia is for; Wikipedia requires verification and generally covers notable subjects. We prefer to avoid original research or very novel ideas, instead generally considering ourselves a repository of information which is already known, if that makes sense. For more information, see what Wikipedia is not. Thanks! Luna Santin 04:47, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Actually, that's what Wikipedia is not for, as Luna points out. Sorry, chief. Part Deux 05:02, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per nom - Hobbeslover ^{talk/contribs} 04:32, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - definitive WP:NFT. --Dweller 07:33, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Street football, people do often play soccer with a bottle. But the current article is completely unencyclopedic. Mathmo ^Talk 13:42, 1 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Inadequately referenced. No redirect for the same reason. WMMartin 16:20, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.