Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bootay

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect. Redwolf24 00:23, 22 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bootay

We already have a page on "Booty" :)

• I say we keep it. This is BOO-TAY. Not booty.(Preceding unsigned comment by 69.250.247.238.
• Waste of pixels nomination, should just be a redirect (but can't make it one as VfD has been started). Speedy redirect to booty and close vote. Proto t c 14:52, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per Proto. Al 15:05, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect per Proto.—Encephalon | ^ζ  17:36:32, 2005-08-16 (UTC)
• Comment - 69.250.247.238 removed the three comments above. I have restored these. Rob Church ^{Talk | Desk} 04:47, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
• I sent the anon a warning not to do it again. - Mgm|^(talk) 08:02, August 17, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, no reason to keep, unless it's standard practice to redirect misspellings. Paul 23:24, 17 August 2005 (UTC)
  • It's common practice to redirect plausible misspellings or variants, yes. Meelar (talk) 16:14, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
    • Technically it's a slang interpretation, not a misspelling. Like "partay" when it's usually "party".
• Redirect to booty. It's redundant by itself.Bjones
• Redirect to booty per me. Seeing as "bootay" is practically a synonym, I don't think we'd miss much redirecting.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.