Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bombtrack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 03:01, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bombtrack

No evidence whatsoever that this is an accepted concept in music, sounds like an original research extrapolation of meaning from the name of one song. Night Gyr (talk/Oy) 13:21, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete While commonly being found in numerous rock and metal pieces of music, it is not recognised by a specific musical theory or as a bombtrack as the article puts it. Certianly a nifty word but original research. Article seems to be an ill fated attempt to glorify Rage Against the Machine. --The Crying Orc 18:28, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as original research. Clever idea and a term which may well catch on, but there's no indication that it has yet done so. Further, the definition is a bit shaky and based on a perhaps faulty premise in the RATM lyrics. The comment on the article's talk page about the song possibly being titled for the lyrical content rather than the style makes a fair bit of sense. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 01:48, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete the correct term is crescendo, which already is part of the dynamics article. --Limetom 02:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The title of the song "Bombtrack" by Rage Against the Machine is obviously refering to the lyrical content of the song, not the crescendo at the start. The contents of the article are original "research" --LeakeyJee 10:53, 19 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.