Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bojunk testavez

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. jni 16:08, 8 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Bojunk testavez

Unverifiable. Orphan article which cites no sources. Only things I can find on Google is this article, nothing on other sites, nothing on newsgroups. I see no evidence this drink actually exists. --W.marsh 00:18, 3 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete with flying colors; NPOV issues out the wazoo too. --YixilTesiphon 00:26, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ••MDD4696 ( talk - contribs ) 04:24, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Put it out of its misery - one sentence orphaned articles don't belong in Wikipedia. B.Wind 04:39, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete farce and unencyclopedic anyway.--MONGO 09:47, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. --Hurricane111 22:42, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Doesn't seem notable. *Dan T.* 00:48, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete no widespread knowledge of this drink that I can see. - murder1 03:13, 4 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.