Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blogsnob

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Well, that was confusing. Apparently this was on AfD and VfD simultaneously. Combining the two (or even considering each separately), we have a rough consensus. android79 15:38, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Blogsnob

Please note that this is a renomination, where the article already sported a deletion notice linking to an existing discussion at Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Blogsnob that was on-going at the time.

WP is not a dictionary Paul 01:38, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete: Wikipedia is not a place to coin sniglets, either. Ugly and wasteful. Geogre 02:09, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per nom Joelito 02:10, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Nice neologism, though. Nandesuka 03:25, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism. Flowerparty 07:25, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. Anville 11:05, 7 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, because blogsnob spelled backwards is bonsgolb, and, well, that's just unacceptable. (also, neologism). -- BD2412 ^talk 01:44, 8 September 2005 (UTC)

Should the above Delete comments be classed as Blogsnobbery.?

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.