Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black and White: No Gray Area
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-22 10:46Z
[edit] Black and White: No Gray Area
Nominated per WP:NOT#CRYSTALBALL and WP:HOAX. Ref links direct to a blog. Mislead the readers. Lajbi Holla @ me 16:58, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Comment - this article should not be deleted because it has sources that it exists. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Peterm1991 (talk • contribs).
-
- RE: The "sources" are from a blog Superior1 21:55, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per fan-based. No refs. Lajbi Holla @ me 16:59, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete as per Wikipedia is not a crystal ball, JameiLei 18:18, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Also, that album cover is obviously fake. Superior1 07:08, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
I am also nominating the following related pages because these are also speculative articles about alleged albums from the same artists from the same creator. Lajbi Holla @ me 22:14, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
- Mental Release (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Standing Ovation (album) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)
- Delete Though news of a new album is great. Recreate it when/if more verifiable news appears. 2Pac 01:18, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- weak keep seems to have some notability. But it needs more sources--Sefringle 05:11, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
