Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Black Women with Large Rumps
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. I decline to include it in BJODADN (because it's just not funny) but won't object if someone else does so. Rossami (talk) 05:42, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Black Women with Large Rumps
Offensive article, with offensive title. Provides no useful content. UkPaolo 12:23, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Steatopygia. Known "disorder": "Steatopygia is an unusual accumulation of fat in and around the buttocks. The deposit of fat is not confined to the gluteal regions, but extends to the outside and front of the thighs, forming a thick layer reaching sometimes to the knee." --Cool Cat My Talk 12:36, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep. As a black woman, I am proud of my body. You think my beautiful black body is offensive? You are racist. We should celebrate diversity, not censor it. 68.97.208.123 15:40, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Hahaha... Delete and transfer to BJAODN Themindset 15:52, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete and Transfer to BJADON. --Jpbrenna 17:29, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete As above Anshu 17:36, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Cleanup offensive elements and then merge (particularly the songs) with Steatopygia. Like it or not there is a cultural element to this. :) — RJH 19:08, 12 August 2005 (UTC)
- Crap article, bad taste. Redirect to Bootylicious, or preferably something more encyclopedic about how yummy black women's bottoms are. --Tony SidawayTalk 02:07, 13 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Who on earth would search for this? Peter Isotalo 01:36, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Someone who is pervy for booty, of course! --Tony SidawayTalk 02:18, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with Steatopygia. The fact that it is offensive should not be grounds to delete, much of the world is offensive. However, it doesn't seem to add much, what it does could be put into Steatopygia. Avalon 04:28, 14 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It would be racist to merge. This article presents a phenomenon genetically and culturally distinct from the steatopygic Khoikhoi. To merge on the basis of a superficial similarity would be racist. This article should be retitled and developed. Eyeon 05:25, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- So why didn't you "retitle" it when you created it? More evidence of bad faith: the author and creator of the article is here posing as a neutral and impartial voter. -- Curps 15:52, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. The utterly unencyclopedic title is a strong indication of bad faith. -- Curps 15:18, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN. --Kiand 15:26, 15 August 2005 (UTC)
- Merge with suggested article and put current version in BJAODN. --Merovingian (t) (c) 19:20, August 15, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. This is coolness. -- This vote by User:70.92.105.107 -- Curps 20:32, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete no useful content. 19:12, 16 August 2005 (UTC) -- This vote by User:Drini -- Curps 20:32, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Comment For the folks voting merge, can you clarify whether you want a redir to remain? -- Curps 20:39, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete it quietly and without much fuss. User:Eyeon, the creator of this article, is a sockpuppet-wielding troll whose chief contributions include blessing the Wikipedia with this wonderful image. Most of his time was generally spent ruining any articles he could find that were related to his scat fetish. We're being tested again; let's not fail this time. --Ardonik.talk()* 09:30, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Ridiculous. Punkmorten 21:18, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete this adds no new knowledge to Wikipedia. It would be a disservice to the readers of steatopygia, since that is clearly a disease. The social commentart is already covered under the topic buttock, another Wiki-nusance. User:kryzadmz,20:20, August 18, 2005 (UTC)
- BJAODN and merge with steatopygia. D. J. Bracey (talk) 17:11, 22 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.