Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bizarnage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 03:49, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bizarnage

Article on extremely obscure comic book character. The Google test lists 1100 results, including quite a few forum/blog user profiles and even pages claiming that they can't find that entry. Very obscure, not notable, void of any encyclopedic value. --Mecanismo | Talk 17:37, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, although I'll change my view if secondary references are included. Addhoc 17:49, 27 August 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Herostratus 18:49, 4 September 2006 (UTC)

• merge to Amalgam Comics iff references are provided, otherwise delete. Thryduulf 19:52, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as a totally non-notable character.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 20:15, 4 September 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Most of the Amalgam character pages really need to go. Amalgam was 24 comics if I remember right. At most.. characters made maybe only 3 or 4 appearances total. Also, Wikipedia doesn't need to be a place for every comic character ever. RobJ1981 04:24, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

• Redirect and merge to Amalgam. Too obscure for separate article. Google hits also give a not terribly notable webpage and the user id of someone at marvel.com. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 20:18, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.