Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Biip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. – Avi 15:10, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Biip

My Norwegian being a bit rusty I'm not able to assess this website but it gets little in the way of Google hits. An unsourced 'fastest growing' doesn't confer notability to me. TerriersFan 00:43, 4 July 2006 (UTC)

• Weak keep. It dosen't seem that notable. However, there are articles on websites for a similar purpose, such as MySpace and Miniclip. Green caterpillar 01:53, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment It is a question of notability not purpose. MySpace is undoubtedly notable. Miniclip should possibly be reviewed since it looks more like an advert to me. However, I am saying Delete because there are insufficient Google hits (that I can find anyway) to show any real notability. TerriersFan 02:22, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. [1] vs. [2] Even in Norway this pales in comparison to Myspace. The site looks tacky and very commercial. You can't even get past the frontpage without sending in a text message. This feels like spam for one of countless many naff mobile phone services aimed at teenagers. Without any assertion of significance it should be deleted.--IslaySolomon 02:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No real evidence of notability. If their membership has grown to the levels claimed in 5 months, there should be some news articles or something that the author can cite to back it up. Otherwise, it's yet another advert article. --NMChico24 02:49, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Not very notable, especially on a global scale. This is probably better off on the Norwegian Wikipedia. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 03:24, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
  • delete Better off in the Norwegian Wikipedia. Not too global it seems.
  • Wikipedia is project that should be accesible to anyone. Entries shouldn't be deleted for not having an international appeal. That said. This appears to be basic spam that cannot even be compared to MySpace. Delete. - Mgm|^(talk) 12:51, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. SM247^{My Talk} 04:29, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above.--Tdxiang 06:47, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NN -- Alias Flood 19:19, 4 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, shouldn't even be in the no.wikipedia (and it isn't, I've checked), just another website. --Eivind^t@c 23:02, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.