Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Better Badges (second nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. --Luigi30 (Taλk) 18:37, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Better Badges

Better Badges (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Page deleted by a prior AFD. Sources produced at deletion review are of debatable quality. Relisted for debate on whether the sources listed in the deletion review are sufficient to have an article. Please read both discussions before opining. I have no opinion, this is a technical nomination. GRBerry 13:54, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep per my findings at the DRV. There are quite a few sources, some of which are trivial, but the one in The Face is a multi-page article all about Better Badges. Also persuasive is the fact that Better Badges had their "Top Ten" published in the magazine NME as an indicator of underground buzz and popularity. I think there's a decent encyclopedia article to be had here. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 15:25, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

The article definitely needs work. I'll try and improve it this week. I did manage to contact the photographer for The Face article, who has given permission for his photos to be used.Wwwhatsup 19:26, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. The text is rough, but the article is still somewhat new. The Face article secures notability in my mind. - grubber 23:40, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.