Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Betrayal

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was KEEP. -Splash^talk 21:50, 6 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Betrayal

Wikitionary entry ≈ jossi ≈ 02:08, 30 September 2005 (UTC)

• Keep, the psychology of betrayal is encycylopedic. Kappa 06:47, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep for now. The article has just been created (9/29) and may grow into something useful, though I'm skeptical. It can be deleted later. -- Kjkolb 09:12, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: This article reminds me of belligerency and belligerent. Actually, belligerency was an Encyclopedia Britannica entry that was missing by the same name here. Likewise, I think Betrayal also has a lot of potential to grow, albeit in a different style and context. --Bhadani 14:59, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Only 3 minutes passed after the article's creation before User:Jossifresco stamped an {{afd}} template on the article. Whatever happened to AfD etiquette? Adraeus 20:38, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep This article already goes well beyond a dicdef. It has the potential to grow into something quite useful. Denni☯ 02:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Looks like it will develop into a "psychology of betrayal" article. Actively being expanded. Jkelly 23:57, 1 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.