Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bernice Alvarez Brownson

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 00:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Bernice Alvarez Brownson

Bernice Alvarez Brownson (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No indication of notability: [1]. Was tempted to tag it db-bio, but it's been around for a while, so I am WP:AGFing and seeing if more evidence comes up. Patstuart^talk·edits 13:46, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Alf^Photoman 15:31, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Delete, fails WP:Bio - subject might become notable if book is produced, and has an interesting family, but is not currently notable in Wiki terms. Nothing, or next to nothing, on Google. Springnuts 14:17, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete — per Springnuts. Have a happy St. Patty's Day! Bushcarrot (Talk·Guestbook) 16:24, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
• weak delete unfortunately. If she were just a little more N in her own right I might be tempted to say IAR.DGG 04:18, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Not notable, seems not to have been professionally engaged in any of the fields mentioned. Johnbod 17:45, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I'm afraid the subject doesn't meet the guidelines in WP:N and there's nothing in the article that makes a special case. Tyrenius 23:58, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.