Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Benedict de Boithor
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 01:22, 19 November 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Benedict de Boithor
nn Polish nobleman, only one account supposedly, the source of which is not included. Zero Google hits. User:Zoe|(talk) 06:23, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete some sort of hoax Renata3 14:10, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment: Just because there's only one account of his existence doesn't mean it's not true. I would expect that noblemen from 1458 have a very bad Google presence. People like this are better verified using books and paper archives.- Mgm|(talk) 15:11, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. How can we verify this is no source is cited. - Dalbury (talk) 16:04, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Searching on Google Print reveals the source for this article: it's a paraphrase of a section of Raymond McNally's In Search of Dracula. McNally does not appear to cite a specific source for this anecdote, and I really don't think a single unsourced anecdote from a book on a tangential subject is adequate for an article on a supposedly historical figure. Therefore this may be considered unverifiable, and should be deleted. — Haeleth Talk 18:05, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Comment. This article is taken from [[1]] and may be a copy vio of [2]. FWIW Amazon.com returned 29 cites in response to a search on Benedict de Boithor.--FRS 19:14, 13 November 2005 (UTC)
- Delete if this person was a genuine Polish nobleman, and not just an apocryphal figure in a legend about Dracula, there would be more evidence for his existence. PatGallacher 01:18, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
