Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ben Hale

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:09, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ben Hale

Ben Hale (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Contested speedy. Remarkable, perhaps, but not notable. "Ben Hale" is a common name I guess but this Ben Hale doesn't come up at all in the first Google few pages - granting that people born in 1910 have less presence on the net than younger folk, I supppose. He does have a book on Amazon. If I knew more about his radio show, maybe, but I don't have any reason to suppose it wasn't a local show on a low-watt station. Herostratus 07:11, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete, can't find a thing on the man in context of a radio show, only mention of real-estate position is in his obituary. Agree with Herostratus-sounds like a pretty cool guy if you knew him, but not too much verifiable information on him seems to be out there. Seraphimblade 07:18, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per those above. Definitely seems like an impressive person, but largely unverifiable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:45, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. Seems like a cool guy, but WP is not an obituary. Gzkn 07:49, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. MER-C 08:46, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, unverifiable, WP:NOT. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 10:30, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete until someone can find more verifiable info. riana_dzasta 13:58, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — Non-notable yet, and unverifiable. –- kungming·2 ^(Talk) 18:34, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. ReverendG 23:51, 24 November 2006 (UTC)
• For the record, the two previously-deleted articles named "Ben Hale" were not about this individual; rather, they were generic adolescent nonsense. I have no comment on the nonagenarian. DS 14:29, 26 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.