Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Battle of Nasiriyah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy keep as nomination withdrawn and nobody is arguing for deletion. GRBerry 02:02, 1 September 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Battle of Nasiriyah

No original research. This page has no sources or links what so ever and the warning template has been up for over a week. No one seems interested in maintaining or fixing this article including its creator. NeoFreak 07:08, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. Sources have been added and I no longer see the need for a delete. Specific numbers still need sourcing though. NeoFreak 13:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Weak Keep - Someone should link Jessica Lynch to this page, and give Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history a chance to flesh out the stub. --Dennette 10:20, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep a week is not a long time - I've worked on articles with tags on for a year. The battle is clearly real. Covered in Marines in the Garden of Eden: The Battle for An Nasiriyah - ISBN 0425209881 and appears as notable as any other battle in the war Peripitus (Talk) 11:48, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep sourced, encyclopaedic. Links are not a requirement for sourcing. WilyD 13:15, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment Should this not be a Speedy Keep now that the nom has been withdrawn? Marcus22 15:17, 31 August 2006 (UTC)
  • Nominator withdraws nomination, no one argues for deletion is a criterion for a Speedy Keep, if you wish to argue for it, yes. WilyD 15:22, 31 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.