Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bartcop

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was keep. Sjakkalle (Check!) 28 June 2005 11:14 (UTC)

[edit] Bartcop

Delete Nicely put together ad for a site but blogger ads don't belong in wikipedia Bloghate 00:41, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• No vote. Alexa turns up a ranking of 44,565, pretty good for a blog I must say. -Hmib 01:18, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Some NPOV work on the article would improve it, but ok article on notable site. -- Infrogmation 02:18, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. Well-known blogger. This is a disruptive VfD nomination. Rhobite 02:24, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - note the nominator's username. Disruptive nominators pushing POV on VfD... Barfooz (talk) 02:48, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I disagree with the "blog" classification. The site was created long before the concept was popularized. Regardless, Bart is routinely referenced in relevant outlets such as Air America Radio, Democratic Underground, et al, and is very well-known in the left-liberal milieu. —Seselwa 03:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. This isn't some random livejournal. GeeZee 04:02, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Comment. Can extremely popular be verified/measured? Peter Grey 05:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Word `extremely` removed, left popular, as it seems it is. -Snorre/Antwelm 06:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep First edit 2003. Seems notable. Do not trust nominator (see name). -Snorre/Antwelm 06:30, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; if people believe this is disruptive, they should consider discussing it with User:Bloghate, or filing an WP:RFC. Radiant_>|< 09:37, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep; perfectly good blog.--Anurag Sharma 17:35, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Keep although I'd reccomend edits to remove POV items. --TNLNYC 22:21, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.