Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Barry L. Zubrow

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 13:30, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Barry L. Zubrow

Barry L. Zubrow (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article was speedy deleted as CSD A7, with the complication that its authorship, by User:Mrzubrow, created obvious COI issues -- the author also linkspammed. A DRV consensus concluded that notability was asserted, and that COI issues were best left to AfD. Please see the DRV for additional details. This matter is submitted to AfD for full consideration. This is a procedural relisting, so I abstain. Xoloz 17:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

• DeleteDoes not appear to be notable. The sources are just company bios, which almost every officer of every company has. I don't think that it counts as a source for notability.Chunky Rice 18:05, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Other than the company bios, I can't google up any reliable sources that would add to a claim of notability. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:19, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• weak Delete NN local political and business figure. No major specific accomplishments. "Facilitated" the sale of a major building. But DREV was right--this might have been a suitable prod, but not a speedy.'—The preceding unsigned comment was added by DGG (talk • contribs) 03:29, 10 March 2007 (UTC).
• Weak Delete, A Forbes mention unfortuantely does not cut it for me. Despite what I said before, I don't really think anymore that Zubrow is notable enough to deserve an article. Warning: The following sentence presents faulty reasoning!: If B. Zubrow needed an article, then why was the only person to make an article his own son? No but seriously, this guy seems to me like another corporate guy just far enough up the ladder to technically merit an article, but not high enough for anybody to care, no offense. SeanMD80^{talk | contribs} 00:15, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Officers, bishops, investment bankers are not inherently notable, and I don't see anything that's different in this case. And the dripping language (having earned the highest respect and admiration from all his coworkers and employees) doesn't help either. ~ trialsanderrors 07:56, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.