Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bank Identification Number

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. SynergeticMaggot 08:06, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bank Identification Number

An unmaintainably long list of codes which can be authoritatively looked up on the web. We have already deleted the list of SWIFT codes, I think this should go the same way. Just zis Guy you know? 19:14, 26 July 2006 (UTC)

• Keep - the article needs some cleanup, and the list should be removed. -- Whpq 19:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - If there is a precedent for this being deleted, please provide a link. Just because something is available elsewhere on the web doesn't automatically mean it shouldn't have an article. Sorry, but it is a weak argument. Could use some cleaning up, but that's no reason from an AfD. EVula 19:29, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Though the list of every number is inappropriate in the article, I have removed those. Ifnord 19:31, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the article, but remove the list of codes. RFerreira 21:21, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep the list was rightly removed; the current article, while short, is informative and so worth keeping. Ziggurat 21:25, 26 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep The best outcome of an AFD discussion is an improved article. Kudos to Ifnord who eliminated the concern in the nomination. GRBerry 02:02, 27 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.