Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bangor lakes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 23:51, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Bangor lakes

This is an odd procedural addition to AfD. This one seems to have been tagged on April 14th, but the user seemed to not complete it, so, here I am, completing it over a month later. No vote from me, just a procedural adding to AfD. Metros232 03:09, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Weak Delete Unsourced. Of questionable notability. I can't for the life of me figure out what this article is attempting to do! Nor can I find a reason to keep it unless the person who created it can come up with some sort of explanation or plan for development. Ande B 04:13, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete - Unsourced, so I can't really tell what this article is supposed to be about... Wickethewok 07:06, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - usourced, speculative, contrary. Just plain weird. Rockpocket ^-talk- 07:35, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete unsourced/verified WP:V. There is also this email here Talk:Bangor, New South Wales, posted on that page by the original AfD tagger.--blue520 14:08, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all above. Paddles 14:42, 27 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WHAT??? No clue what this is here for... Original, unverified research and should be a part of Bangor if it was written better and verifiable. Grandmasterka 04:07, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. —Khoikhoi 04:38, 28 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.