Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banglighting

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

You have new messages (last change).
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy delete. HappyCamper 13:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Banglighting

Banglighting (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Probable hoax article, as there are no ghits for this supposed "practice", and the content does not appear to be verifiable. No sources given either. SunStar Nettalk 00:49, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete Unsourced, unverifiable, likely WP:NFT. Fan-1967 00:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Author of this article just recreated The cult of briefsism, so we can forget WP:AGF. -- Fan-1967 00:55, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy per WP:SNOW. I KNOW it's not policy. --N Shar 00:59, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BJAODN! --- RockMFR 01:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete and BJAODN sounds like a good time though.--Tainter 01:27, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 01:53, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Is still my vote here... Philippe Beaudette 02:18, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • (edit conflict) Speedy delete nonsense -- Selmo (talk) 02:19, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BJAODN per discussion. This is horribly silly and put a smirk on my face. --Dennisthe2 02:24, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BJAODN it is. Possible Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not (outtakes) candidate. Doubt it's WP:NFT -- probably made up while something more, er, interesting. --Shirahadasha 02:26, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Quadzilla99 02:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per WP:HOAX JCO312 03:11, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • What the heck, BJAODN. - Penwhale | Blast the Penwhale 03:54, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BJAODN - I can see it now.. "Wikipedia is not: a listing of erotic exploding lightbulb terms" --Wooty Woot? contribs 05:50, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • BJAODN It's nonsense, but it's nonsense that made me giggle. Eeblefish 06:41, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • How many bored teenagers does it take to screw in a lightbulb? Delete junk. JuJube 10:43, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, per User:JCO312. --PaxEquilibrium 13:25, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: What is BJAODN? --PaxEquilibrium 13:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
    It means WP:BJAODN. --HappyCamper 13:28, 23 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org../../../a/r/t/Wikipedia%7EArticles_for_deletion_Banglighting_02c3.html"