Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avro Aerospace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Avro. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 07:38Z

[edit] Avro Aerospace

Avro Aerospace (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

nn company Mzlc 09:42, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• delete as spam. If the article was reliably sourced per WP:CORP, maybe, But how many companies get government contracts to research various things? Probably a lot that aren't very notable.Montco 00:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
  • comment as an aside google references can actually relate to Avro which is actually an old Aerospace firm whose name was used on British Aerospace jets. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Montco (talk • contribs) 00:20, 19 February 2007 (UTC).

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Daniel.Bryant 10:45, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete and redirect to Avro, the company which anybody searching for this title will actually be looking for. Forget British Aerospace, Avro built the Lancaster bomber, as used in the Dambusters raids, and the Avro 504, an iconic WWI biplane. Guy (Help!) 11:38, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Avro per above. When I first saw this I thought it was referring to the article on that notable company. If this article is kept, it really needs to be renamed with some sort of disambiguation. 23skidoo 13:48, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to the eminently notable Avro. This company doesn't do much to indicate notability at this point. Tony Fox (arf!) 23:58, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per JzG. No reliable sources provided. John Vandenberg 04:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.