Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Australian albums
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-09 08:47Z
[edit] Australian albums
This article seems to have no purpose. It might be intended as a list article, in which case it is misnamed. Freekee 03:25, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Appears to be a dicdef, possibly of a neologism. 03:32, 5 February 2007 (UTC)Natalie
- Delete Albums are listed by label, and only in categories, this user should be told. Xiner (talk, email) 04:49, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Albums are categorized in several ways, including nationality, and the user was informed of this. -Freekee 06:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I don't have a clue what this article is trying to say, but it is definitely not useful. Chairman S. Talk Contribs 05:09, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete -- even if this was a list, a category (which already exists) would do a far better job of it. - Longhair\talk 05:36, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions. -- Bduke 07:56, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - I can't see any possible use for this article. --Roisterer 09:07, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment. It is clear that this article is not very usefull at present, but is that a reason for deletion? Maybe we need to wait for the editor who wrote it to explain what it is really about and move it forward in that direction. I reserve judgement. --Bduke 11:20, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete un-necessary.--cj | talk 12:54, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete It certainly looks like it is intended as the header for a list. They can try recreating it as List of notable Australian albums, and then we can have the discussion as to whether that is really necessary. --Brianyoumans 15:40, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete bit of an odd one to start and leave. Topic is better handled through categories anyway. --Madmedea 15:53, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- Comment X would be better handled by a category is not a reason for deletion in my view. At least, not without some explaination of HOW or WHY it would be better handled by a category. Jcuk 22:51, 5 February 2007 (UTC)
- It is not even clear if this is intended as a list. But if it were, it would be impossible to maintain it as well as Category:Australian albums. If it's not meant to be a list, the info should probably go in Music of Australia. In answer to above, the author has been notifieed, and he is active daily. -Freekee 06:18, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete Completely and utterly unmaintainable as a list, and the category already exists. ShadowHalo 01:18, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
