Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Atheist right

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. El_C 13:02, 18 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Atheist right

Atheist right (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

No sources, non-notable term, seems to be original research. Mdwh 02:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

• delete I concur ~ Feureau 03:49, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete This is a silly article, probably intended to create some balance with Atheist left. Wikipedia and mirrors aside, zero Google hits for this as a term. Robert A.West (Talk) 05:10, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. The only thing that can be said about the "atheist right" is that it is atheist and it is right-wing... -- Nikodemos 05:55, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As at best a neologism with original research thrown in. Among other issues, the article claims that George Lincoln Rockwell was an atheist while the article on him makes it clear that that was very often not true. JoshuaZ 05:59, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete even fewer hits (702) than athiest left (780), and the vast majority of them aren't related. Religious right is a term, athiest right is not. Ultra-Loser Talk / Contributions 06:04, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete: the article is quite absurd. The implication that altruism interferes with capitalism (or that some people believe it to be so) is completely unsourced and based on a cartoonish "Gordon Gekko" idea of what capitalism is. Allon Fambrizzi 07:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)Allon Fambrizzi
• Delete - as the Athiest left page (above); both POV articles, non notable.SkierRMH 09:27, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, bunch of nonsense and non-notable views. --Terence Ong _{(C | R)} 13:31, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Pointless. Also purely confined to a US perspective.--Folantin 14:02, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. For same reasons as Athiest Left. Black-Velvet 14:24, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Merge to Secular right as this seems to simply be about the outright atheists in that political stream rather than a unique movement of its own.--T. Anthony 20:40, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as orginal research and not-notable. Hello32020 21:21, 13 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete OR personal essay about protologism. JChap2007 01:54, 14 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, original research. Herostratus 14:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.