Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspiette

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus (3 to 4) so I shall redirect to autistic culture. Redwolf24 (talk) 20:36, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aspiette

Neoligism. Even if it isn't neoligism its a dicdef. REDIRECT to autistic culture where it can be put in proper context. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 08:18, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete IMHO no need to redirect. Dlyons493 09:21, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect - why not? --Mysidia (talk) 12:34, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, the terms creator admits that it isn't widely used. -- Kjkolb 04:50, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Why not? Wikipedia is not a dictionary, that's why. / Peter ^Isotalo 05:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as an unstable neologism. -Hapsiainen 08:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirects hurt no-one. In fact, the more the better, so long as they're not confusing or insulting. ··gracefool |☺ 18:34, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
  • The redirect would be confusing. Hardly no-one in Asperger community uses the word aspiette, see discussion about it. [1] The users are tiny minority inside a small minority. I believe that only the word inventor and the inventor's pals use that word. That's why the word shouldn't be in any article in Wikipedia, and there shouldn't be any redirect. An anon already removed the word from autistic culture article with good reason. -Hapsiainen 09:16, 27 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.