Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspie

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was No Consensus to where to redirect. I'll be bold and redirect to autistic culture. Redwolf24 (talk) 20:34, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Aspie

Neoligism. Even if it isn't neoligism its a dicdef. REDIRECT to autistic culture where its put in proper context. Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 08:17, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete IMHO no need to redirect. Dlyons493 09:20, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as Redirect -- Why not? --Mysidia (talk) 12:36, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as redirect - Aspie is not a neologism, I know of it from elsewhere, but I don't think it is worthy of an article separate to Aspergers. --MacRusgail 13:31, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• merge to Aspergers Not a neologism. Roodog2k (talk) 21:59, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
  • The information is already in Aspergers.... Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 22:03, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• comment I know the info is there. By voting merge, I am stating that I do not want to see the article edit history deleted/removed. I do not want to see the article deleted and then recreated as a redirect. Roodog2k (talk) 22:13, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep as redirect - Guettarda 01:59, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect as per above. -- Kjkolb 04:49, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a dictionary. / Peter ^Isotalo 05:03, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge to autistic culture ··gracefool |☺ 18:33, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.