Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aspen Communications

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete The JPS^{talk to me} 23:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Aspen_Communications

Blatant advertising for Aspen Communications. I've written a bit on the issue on the James T. Chiles talk page. Both articles are essentially plugs for Chiles and Aspen communcations. Are Chiles and Aspen significantly famous or noteworthy enough to have articles? If so, please consider modifying the page so it is more neutral. Otherwise, if they cannot be salvaged, they should be deleted. Wikipedia shouldn't become an advertising space for businesses. Comatose51 16:37, 1 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Editors' recommended actions

• This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. (Liberatore, 2006). 11:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Google reveals that there are quite a few "Aspen Communications" in North America; this one does not stand out as being particularly notable. (Going by Google, the one based in Flagstaff, AZ ([1]) seems to have the edge on this Texas corporation - however, that's for another discussion). Tevildo 18:40, 3 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.