Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/As the poets affirm
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 18:50, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] As the poets affirm
Previously speedied article that still doesn't seem to assert any other notability than getting #8 in a local music poll. Danny Lilithborne 07:21, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. MER-C 07:59, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Pseudomonas 09:10, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Keep, passes WP:MUSIC with independent press coverage in the Ottawan Citizen, Ottawan Sun, Exclaim etc [1]; a fact conveniently ignored by the nominator. Kappa 16:31, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment You also conveniently ignored that a. WP:MUSIC is a guideline, not a policy; b. as it stands, none of the quotes on the TuneVault site have been verified; and c. they don't have an AllMusic entry. Providing verification of the magazine quotes and other important information (such as what notable independent label they're on) would be more helpful than making snide remarks. Danny Lilithborne 20:49, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. —ExplorerCDT 22:21, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment If this was previously speedied should this not be speedied as reposted material? --Spartaz 21:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment An article can only be speedied under G4 if it went through the AfD process before and the article is a duplicate of the one deleted under that AfD. Prods and previous speedys don't qualify. Danny Lilithborne 00:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- I was not aware of that. That is very useful to know. Thank you. --Spartaz 17:20, 22 September 2006 (UTC)
- Comment An article can only be speedied under G4 if it went through the AfD process before and the article is a duplicate of the one deleted under that AfD. Prods and previous speedys don't qualify. Danny Lilithborne 00:12, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Indrian 16:31, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
