Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arwin!

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Cbrown1023 talk 19:24, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Arwin!

Arwin! (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

One sentence article about an "on hiatus" Disney Channel show that hasn't aired an episode. Article's unsourced, failing WP:A. NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 06:13, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per failing the policy on attribution. Logically, if the material cannot be attributed, the notability of the show cannot be determined either using reliable sources, so it also fails the guideline on notability. Kyra_~(talk) 06:35, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Keep. It took me all of four seconds to hit IMDB and pull up the show's entry [1], which has a release date of March 16th. RGTraynor 19:28, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment Isn't IMDB's information user-submitted, making it an unreliable source? NeoChaosX (talk, walk) 20:24, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
    • You can submit info to IMDB, which its editors then review and decide whether to pass or not. A projected Disney Channel show with an air date a bit over a week from now is unlikely to be some fannish hoax. It's a heck of a lot more reliable than Wikipedia is, for that matter. RGTraynor 21:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - until more sources - possibly something offical from Disney itself - can be provided, I still don't think IMDB is enough to satisfy WP:A. And if it is deleted now, I'd be willing to vote keep later if the show is confirmed to exist and given at least a proper stub.--AgentCDE 21:17, 7 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, I find nothing on this to indicate it's notable. Even if we accept IMDB as reliable (which I'd be very, very hesitant to do), it's not enough for a comprehensive article. Seraphimblade ^{Talk to me Please review me!} 04:30, 12 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, but only because there isn't much in the article. IMDb is actually quite reliable (though I prefer corroboration from a second source), but the article doesn't really contain anything except a basic directory entry. Deletion should be without prejudice to proper recreation. -- Black Falcon 00:16, 13 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.