Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arizona Wilder

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 09:33, 29 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Arizona Wilder

NN-person claiming to be involved with conspiracy theory, possible hoax; de-PRODed by anon. IP so I bring it here for deletion DesertSky85451 18:41, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Several hundred google hits[1], and the article reads like a severe POV push. This is the best AfD ever, though, since it led me to "the President and Vice-President of the U.S. are child-molesting, shape-shifting reptilians".[2] Good times. EVula 19:00, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• Oh my god, how did I miss that?? Thank you EVula for pointing that out!!! DesertSky85451 19:38, 21 October 2006 (UTC)

• DeleteNo evidence of notability.Edison 23:14, 21 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete David Icke is encyclopedically notable. This person is not Bwithh 00:40, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• I'd really really love to keep this article if it were just tightly sourced, i.e. with transcripts of her appearances at Maury and suchlike. Bad sadly, no sources → Delete (for now). ~ trialsanderrors 06:18, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
• Do not delete this, they are attempting to control and sensor the internet and remove peoples freedoms. If this woman was lying then they should sue her, her claims remain claims until proven otherwise. Nevertheless it is part of history and should not be removed. Its bad enough that google video has deleted the video. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 84.60.109.151 (talk • contribs).
• PLEASE KEEP —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Portillo (talk • contribs) 09:12, 25 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete- no signs of notability. Dr.khan 16:16, 28 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete nn, possible speedy. Leibniz 20:32, 28 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.