Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/April Wilkner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
You have new messages (last change).
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete - Yomanganitalk 10:34, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] April Wilkner
Losing contestant on a television reality show. About 600 Google hits. [1] Hasn't done anything notable before appearing on the show. Did a bit of a press tour after the show, but that's momentum from the show. Now, just another struggling model. Mikeblas 18:19, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- delete
like the last oneper nom. Cheers, :) Dlohcierekim 18:40, 16 November 2006 (UTC) - Delete per nom. --Nick Y. 19:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. wikipediatrix 21:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. scope_creep 23:08, 16 November 2006 (UTC)
- Keep. Meets WP:BIO, reality contestants are inherently notable. --badlydrawnjeff talk 12:06, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- There's nothing in WP:BIO that specifically says "reality contestants are inherently notable", no matter how many times you keep repeating it. wikipediatrix 16:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, but it does say that television personalities from well known shows are worthy of inclusion. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- It says no such thing. You already made this misstatement on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Racey-Tabrizi. Why are you continuing this disruptive and deceptive tack? wikipediatrix 17:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I would appreciate if you would stop considering my suggestions disruptive. I already epxlained how they meet the notability standard there, too. It's not a misstatement, it's a worthwhile and honest interpretation of the guideline. Please stop making those accusations. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- When you stop misquoting WP:BIO, I'll stop pointing out that you are doing so. wikipediatrix 17:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not, so I'll expect a retraction. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- You said WP:BIO says "reality television personalities from well known shows are worthy of inclusion." It says no such thing. What WP:BIO specifically says is: "Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions" and then goes on to spell out what constitutes "notable". That's drastically different than your own truncated version. wikipediatrix 17:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Okay, what's the difference between "television personalities from well known shows" and "television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions." Because that's the same thing I was reading from, and not "drastically" and hardly "slightly" different. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:44, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- You said WP:BIO says "reality television personalities from well known shows are worthy of inclusion." It says no such thing. What WP:BIO specifically says is: "Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions" and then goes on to spell out what constitutes "notable". That's drastically different than your own truncated version. wikipediatrix 17:25, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not, so I'll expect a retraction. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:22, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- When you stop misquoting WP:BIO, I'll stop pointing out that you are doing so. wikipediatrix 17:18, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- I would appreciate if you would stop considering my suggestions disruptive. I already epxlained how they meet the notability standard there, too. It's not a misstatement, it's a worthwhile and honest interpretation of the guideline. Please stop making those accusations. --badlydrawnjeff talk 17:14, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- It says no such thing. You already made this misstatement on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Racey-Tabrizi. Why are you continuing this disruptive and deceptive tack? wikipediatrix 17:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- No, but it does say that television personalities from well known shows are worthy of inclusion. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:49, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- There's nothing in WP:BIO that specifically says "reality contestants are inherently notable", no matter how many times you keep repeating it. wikipediatrix 16:47, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Not notable tv personality JBKramer 18:24, 17 November 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
