Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appeal to contempt

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

Note: Last vote is invalid; currently that user has only edited on AFD discussions. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 02:40, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Appeal to contempt

Appears to be a neologism; can find no evidence that this term is actually used. The fallacy actually described appears to be another form of ad hominem. I'd say Delete. Your thoughts? Christopher Parham (talk) 22:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, as ("appeal to contempt" fallacy) gets 0 Google hits. If there was more information there, worded differently, there might be something to merge with epistemology. Jkelly 22:42, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per Christopher Parham. -- Kjkolb 02:24, 24 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ditto. --Flex 12:18, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge? The term may be incorrect, however the information seems solid enough. Perhaps merge into ad hominem. Unsigned comment by Garfunkel4life (talk • contribs)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.