Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Appadurai Muttulingam Archive1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. The argument about Macros Made Easy being refuted by JzG, I think that's it. Userfying is not practical, as Mr Muttulingam already has a userpage, and quite detailed it is, too. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 07:04, 11 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Appadurai Muttulingam

I doubt this person's notability. It is self-promo. It was created by himself. The user has created nonsensical articles that are up for deletion. - Ganeshk (talk) 00:41, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as nn.Blnguyen | Have your say!!! 04:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:BIO and WP:VANITY, or possibly userfy --TBC^{??? ??? ???} 06:00, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. --Khoikhoi 07:44, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, vanity bio. --Terence Ong 10:42, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - But seriously re-write "Macros Made Easy" is not literature, but is publication[1] does make the author notable. Vadakku Veethi can be seen to exist too, though really more references are needed. --Irishpunktom\^talk 11:22, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete The book "Macros made easy" is published by Janus, which does "subsidy publishing" -for previously unpublished authors - not exactly a vanity press but not far off either; Amazon has no sales rank and no reviews for the book. None of the others listed appear on Amazon at all. The article is clearly a vanity autobiography. Just zis Guy you know? 14:59, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Delete vanity bio Gflores^Talk 17:30, 6 April 2006 (UTC)
• Userfy to User:Amuttu as vanity bio. Fagstein 17:46, 6 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.