Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Apoultrian

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 08:30, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Apoultrian

Non-notable neologism (the article even says "neologism"), apparently coined four days ago in a webcomic. Was deprodded by original author with no reason given. —Scott5114↗ 16:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom, and the article is also unlikely to become more than a dictionary definition. --Mr. Lefty _{Talk to me!} 16:23, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Maybe it should've even been speedied. And wiktionary certainly wouldn't take it, it fails their guidelines. Picaroon9288|ta co 16:53, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete WP:NEO. (It's a syndicated newspaper comic, not web.) Check your calendar, Scott. This showed up this morning. Fan-1967 18:12, 4 August 2006 (UTC)

Heh, seems my computer's clock is off by four days :) —Scott5114↗ 01:03, 5 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per WP:NEO and WP:WINAD. Scorpiondollprincess 18:14, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Whpq 18:16, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Fan-1967; this is a nonce word from a single episode of a comic strip. --Metropolitan90 02:53, 5 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Scorpiondollprincess. -- Dragonfiend 06:25, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nominator, this neologism is not in widespread or even minor use. Yamaguchi先生 22:54, 8 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.