Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Annesley Abercorn
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 04:46, 21 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Annesley Abercorn
Parliamentary researchers are not notable. Being a parliamentary researcher is this person's sole distinctiveness Matthew Platts 22:35, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- He was National Chairman of Conservative Future, which is a bit more notable than that. But the article is very badly written and I don't believe that he is sufficiently notable. Hence I vote delete. David | Talk 22:47, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- He was not the National Chairman - he was a co-opted member of the National Executive in previous years. Paul Bristow, then and now National Chairman, did have a page which was VFDed a while back. Timrollpickering 22:52, 7 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. If Paul Bristow (CF National Chairman) and Chris D. Kelly (CF Black Country Area Chairman and a former member of the National Management Executive) don't qualify for inclusion then pages like this cannot consistently stay. Timrollpickering 00:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Anyone can join the Bow Group, [1]. the wub "?/!" 10:38, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. Dottore So 19:11, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn as above.-Splash 20:07, 16 August 2005 (UTC)
- Weak delete - dreadful article, researchers not notable. However being national chairman of conservative future is notable as far as I am concerned, but this seems to be disputed. Secretlondon 05:02, 18 August 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
