Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anna Fowler

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus to delete. W.marsh 18:17, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Anna Fowler

Anna Fowler (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Non Notable Person. A virtual unknown presenter, which results in an empty article page. The Dinkle 05:45, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. One of a large number of presenters on a little-watched satellite TV quiz channel. Not notable. Sam Blacketer 13:06, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to The Great Big British Quiz. Not notable, and little scope for expansion. →Ollie (talk • contribs) 16:24, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep Can not support AfD from new user, who should not be involved in or proposing AfD until experience is gained. Go contribute for a while then judge the work of others. --Kevin Murray 18:40, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment: surely you should choose whether or not to support an AfD based on the merits of the article itself, rather than the amount of experience the user may have? →Ollie (talk • contribs) 19:31, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Can't agree with you. There is a danger here of AfD being bloated by articles that should have been prodded or left alone. There is little good that can come from encouraging novices to jump in as gnomes, before understanding the system. --Kevin Murray 21:59, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

• Congrats. That is no doubt the most ridiculous and twisted form of logic for a participant of an open source project I've ever heard. As a matter of fact I'm going to have to save that nugget of wisdom somewhere in my user space. NeoFreak 00:28, 19 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. Same as with Ronan above. YechielMan 19:32, 18 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable. Also, I would commend The Dinkle for being bold and jumping right into the wikiprocess with what appears to be a legit AfD nomination. Well done. NeoFreak 00:23, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: Non-notable as per nom.Veronica Mars fanatic 14:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - A presenter on a national Sky Digital show is notable. Per WP:BIO: "Notable actors and television personalities who have appeared in well-known films or television productions." The Great Big British Quiz is a very well-known show in Britain. And I too have problems with new users nominating articles for AfD. --Oakshade 03:38, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
• keep As oakshade but also noted that the the user thedinkle that created this talk page has created an article about one presenter on The Great Big British Quiz and has now either nominated or voted to delete all articles about other presenters on this channel.Hotmann 23:24, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

• Comment Carryl Varley article was done mostly for her previous role as a british singer in the 90's. It's been through AfD, and kept strangely enough. The Dinkle 00:41, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

• Her IMDB page is sparse, but her personal cv seems pretty extensive--although I'm not familiar with the shows. If a handful of the achivements listed there can be verified, I'd go with keep. As for the new user/old user debate, anyone who wants to clean up around here should welcome to give it a go. -MrFizyx 00:11, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• Keep - notable British person. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 12:00, 23 February 2007 (UTC)
• delete small presenter on a small channel. Not really worthy. DannyDoodles 00:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• keep per oakshade and my rationale on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ronan McKenna. John Vandenberg 07:43, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film and TV-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 07:39, 24 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.