Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (nom 4)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy KEEP WP:SNOW we've debated this too often, too recently. -Doc 14:06, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Angela Beesley

Angela Beesley was nominated for deletion on 2005-04-01. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley.

Angela Beesley was nominated for deletion on 2005-10-19. The result of the discussion was "keep". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (2nd nomination).

Angela Beesley was nominated for deletion on 2006-07-12. The result of the discussion was "no consensus". For the prior discussion, see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Angela Beesley (3rd nomination).

Speedy Delete, Recreate and redirect to Wikia - While she may or may not be notable i cannot find any indiction she is really notable. Matthew Fenton (Talk | Contribs) 12:53, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

• Nothing has changed since the prior discussion. For the reasons given twice before, which still stand, keep. Uncle G 13:21, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Nomination number four. Delete, I say. If Angela was a former boardmember of any other website in the top twenty of Alexa, this article would have been deleted a long time ago. It may also be interesting to note that two out of three previous nominations were made by Angela Beesley herself.—♦♦ SʘʘTHING^(Я) 13:23, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete — nn Martinp23 13:46, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep. Fourth nomination, short time after the last one closed, and with no new arguments presented for deletion on this nom. Sjakkalle (Check!) 13:51, 15 August 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Has any article ever been deleted after being kept thrice? WilyD 14:02, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.