Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Zidian (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-13 06:47Z

[edit] Amy Zidian

Amy Zidian (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Previously deleted here and recently speedied by me as a repost, but apparently this version is about her in a different career, or something, so per G4 it's being brought to AfD again. Comments from the user requesting the article be reconsidered are below. -- Steel 23:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Speedy delete was based on previous AfD from July 2006 (as Hawiian Tropic model??) but article was about her subsequent career as a WWE Diva - from NPOV it should have gone to a new AfD rather than Speedy & protected Invisifan 22:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

• No vote. -- Steel 23:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, fancruft. She was on WWE TV for 3 weeks. She barely had a "wrestling career" and I doubt we'll ever see her near WWE again, let alone the wrestling business. Bmg916 23:36, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - on screen career lasted 2 weeks before she was fired. Non-notable person. -- The Hybrid 23:24, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

Comment -- there are Basrball players from the 1920s who played 1 professional game & the notability guidelines say keep them -- she's more notable than that (though personally I'd rather see the nonnotable "notable" sports people removed instead)--Invisifan 23:29, 8 February 2007 (UTC)

• No vote. Personally I find WWE completely pointless but regardless, the current article has to do with her career as a WWE diva which is more recent than the previous article (no material from her previous (deleted) article was even included), so this needs the kept/deleted on it's own merits--Invisifan 23:25, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete for a lack of notability. Otto4711 00:00, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete not everyone who's ever been on-camera for WWE deserves an article. She was on for a few weeks and did nothing. And I also agree that baseball players who play a handful of games should not get their own articles. Booshakla 05:47, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Did nothing worthy of notability. That goes for the baseball players as well. Normy132 07:04, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, not a notable person.«»bd(^talk _stalk) 23:31, 9 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless she gets more major career moves, it's delete for now. Govvy 00:44, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Pretty non-notable, I might have voted keep if she at least appeared at Armageddon (she was supposed to be on it, but was fired the week before). TJ Spyke 08:22, 11 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete People hardly knew her name when she was on, blink and you missed her, not noteable at all MPJ-DK 14:40, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.