Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Americas Funniest Home Videos/Opening Credits

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy deleted as recreation of previously deleted content. Titoxd^{(?!? - help us)} 22:48, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Americas Funniest Home Videos/Opening Credits (sic)

Detailed descriptions of the various opening sequences of the television series America's Funniest Home Videos. Of interest to no one but intensely obsessive fans of the show. tregoweth 00:18, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. Could be useful for future scholars of the show and American culture. -- JJay 00:29, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with America's Funniest Home Videos, for those interested in that kind of minutiae --Thephotoman 01:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. Neither the show nor the credit sequences in question really justify a separate article on the subject. 23skidoo 01:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, wikipedia users should be able to read about the opening credits if they choose, and also able to avoid them (so don't merge). Rename as appropriate. Kappa 01:26, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep under corrected title, America's Funniest Home Videos. --The Famous Movie Director 01:52, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge, then let editors hack it down on the main article. exolon 02:35, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Obscure fancruft. --Apostrophe 04:00, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep, although it needs a rename. -- stillnotelf has a talk page 04:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep Should be a link from America's Funnies Home Videos tagged Trivia - Videos /Opening Credits

These types of articles should not be merged and cause concise articles to be obliterated. Let them have their own page with a link from the title "Trivia" and the hyphen explaining what type. 68.194.42.219 04:10, 21 December 2005 (UTC)TikiWike

• Comment. I believe this was up for AFD not too long ago, perhaps under another name(?) •DanMS 04:32, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • You would be looking for Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Opening Credits of America's Funniest Home Videos. The result was Delete, and should be again. Saberwyn 11:03, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not useful and merging would only cause clutter. Non-notable. — The Hooded Man ♃♂ 05:42, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Just when I thought I've seen it all... Wikipedia continues to redefine obsessive-compulsive for me every day. Flyboy Will 07:50, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, it was up before (and probably deleted before) or it would've been merged or linked. I can't find any reference to the old article. If it was deleted, this can be as well for being a near identical copy. This is exactly the kind of thing one should not try to describe in words. That's why you have videos. - Mgm|^(talk) 09:23, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. I could swear this was on AfD recently under a different name. -- Kjkolb 09:24, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete as per Proto. -- Kjkolb 12:14, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Opening Credits of America's Funniest Home Videos
• Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted content (Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Opening Credits of America's Funniest Home Videos. Proto t c 11:06, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as recreation of previously deleted article. Zordrac (talk) Wishy Washy Darwikinian Eventualist 15:20, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - pointless and unencyclopedic. - squibix 16:04, 21 December 2005 (UTC)``
• Weak Keep and expand/cleanup. -- MisterHand 16:55, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Merge Wiki's not paper so what does it matter if an article is consise? Jcuk 18:45, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Week Keep or Merge. I don't think this is non-notable, so it can't be deleted on that basis. --Cyde Weys _talk^contribs 20:54, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: The other similar page was deleted so why should this be an exception.Deathawk 22:01, 21 December 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete G4. Have tagged as such. howcheng {chat} 22:43, 21 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.